The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader-2010 小鴨 在线-下载-下载-台灣上映-58b-字幕-線上看小鴨影音.jpg
| 字幕 |
The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader (电影 2010) |
持续时间 |
164 会议记录 |
释放 |
2010-08-13 |
品位 |
MPEG-1 1080
HDTV |
类型 |
Adventure, Family, Fantasy |
(运用语言的)方式 |
English |
派(角色) |
Overall
Y.
Hallier, Ibarra G. Khawlah, Carraud E. Arsene |
船员 - The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader 2010 線上看小鴨影音
This time around Edmund and Lucy Pevensie, along with their pesky cousin Eustace Scrubb find themselves swallowed into a painting and on to a fantastic Narnian ship headed for the very edges of the world.
In the immortal words of Col. Kurtz, "The horror...the horror." Marlon Brando wasn't speaking of this film, of course, but rather the horrors of the Vietnam War. The sentiment remains applicable.
When I write reviews, I do try to give at least a modicum of context, be it a history of the film itself, predecessors to its place in cinema history, or my general feelings on the type of film. In this case, I've just referenced Francis Ford Coppola's classic take on Joseph Conrad's "Heart of Darkness," Apocalypse Now. What does that have to do with Dawn Treader? Nothing, and I couldn't be happier. Why? Because it's distracted my mind with thoughts of a far, far better film. Allow me my few moments of happiness before I have to rifle through the dark filing cabinet of my mind to marshal my thoughts on this atrocity.\
What went so wrong here, you may ask? We'll start with the history of this franchise. I do not have the highest opinion of this series. We started out with the most famous of C. S. Lewis' Narnia cycle, The Lion, The Witch, and the Wardrobe. I don't know...perhaps if we hadn't been in the middle of such a fantasy film renaissance, I would have found it more palatable. Instead, coming on the heels of Peter Jackson's generation-defining Lord of the Rings trilogy, and the high class and quality of the Harry Potter franchise, that weak take on a book series that didn't thrill me as a child struck me as a cheap, childish appetizer compared to the magnificent feasts audiences had already been served, their stories facile, their acting (aside from a typically great Tilda Swinton) either poor or phoned-in (Paging Mr. Neeson, your paycheck is waiting for you). SHREK co-director Andrew Adamson was the helmer of both Wardrobe and Caspian, and I had hoped those film's failings were due perhaps to his inexperience as a director of live-action. The first film of course wore its Christian allegory on its sleeve (Lewis, for all his writings, never managed to find the definition of "subtle"), and it found favor with the churchgoing crowd, whose turnout afforded it a huge box office windfall. The second film was more of a straight actioner (in the vein of Star Wars Episode I, which is to say the supposed action was mired in a swamp of facile and achingly dull political machinations), and didn't find purchase with the same demographic, and box office returns were disappointingly low. Disney, who had financed the films, saw the writing on the wall, and dropped the series. That should have been the end of it.
Until 20th Century Fox stepped in. Now, let's remember: Fox doesn't have the best track record with adapting beloved fantasy series into films (a moment of silence for the tragedies that were The Dark is Rising and Eregon, please). Hiring Michael Apted as the director seemed to be bucking the trend of shoveling out crap. Apted isn't really known as an action, fantasy, or epic film director, but he showed promise with the last Pierce Brosnan/James Bond film, The World is Not Enough (I'll not blame him for Denise Richards'...nuclear physicist...sigh). Still, director in place, 20th Century Fox and Walden Media cobbled together another Narnia adventure, and the results were predictably terrible.
Honestly, I wish I hadn't expected a poor film going in. Because this film not only met but exceeded my expectations of terrible, and it's not because I was pre-judging it. It's because it was simply that bad. The plot is nonsensical, randomly shunting characters from one loosely-connected vignette to the next, with hokey dialogue and dire predictions of eeeevil standing in for actual menace or intrigue. It's a shaggy dog road trip story, waterlogged on a boat, and I found myself half an hour in wishing desperately that the characters would all get scurvy and die.
The plot's so thinly-sketched that I may as well not even try to recount it here, but it has something to do with two of the kids from previous films being once again pulled into Narnia at absolute random, with no thematic or plot reason for any of the nonsense in the first place. Once there, our cast is rounded out with their exceptionally annoying cousin, and despite no one knowing quite what's going on, they stumble upon the titular character of the second film, Prince Caspian, and join him on his completely random quest to recover seven old friends of his long-dead father who disappeared for some reason, and no one knows why. So they fight an island made of evil. Good wins, evil is defeated, the end. Please, let it be the end.
Listen: I love fantasy. I love science fiction, I love horror, I love all of the outré genres, the fantastic, the unreal. It fascinates me, and I love wrapping myself in the trappings of the genre like a favored blanket, letting their comforting warmth wash over me in waves of escapism and nostalgia. But this half-assed bunch of hokum had me rolling my eyes, with the stilted dialogue and the hastily-sketched characters and the nonsensical plot and the ARGH it's too much.
The icing on this crap cake was the ham-handed, in-no-uncertain-terms Christian allegory with which the film beat the audience over the head with all the grace, power, and strength of an industrial-size sledgehammer. Yes, the evil was SIN. And Aslan is JESUS. Who exists as a lion in an alternate universe or something, apparently. Who pulls children into this alternate universe at random for...no apparent reason whatsoever (the film explicitly states that it's "to know Him (Aslan i.e. Jesus, in case you didn't already pick up on that) better," but if that's the case, why just these four kids? What's the thematic point of this? Why were the elder kids now judged worthy of not having watery allegory poured down their throats again? What did these kids learn at the end of this film that made them better people?
ARGH again. I cannot even begin to catalogue the problems with this series, from either the internal "logic" of the series or the external logic of the human brain. Doing so only hurts my head.
Remember how I said the second film in the series lacked the ham-fisted Christian allegory of the first? Well, 20th Century Fox apparently recognized the church-going demographic was what made the first film such a success, and had them ramp up the religious content from "allegory" to "explicit yelling at the audience and rubbing its nose in it like it's a puppy who peed on the carpet." This sentiment struck me as wholly insincere, a manufactured "message" shoehorned in by a film studio who wanted nothing more than to reap the box office rewards of the first film which felt, though unsubtle, genuine in its intentions.
I've seen films more poorly shot, more poorly acted, more poorly assembled. But this boring, useless, preachy slog with no purpose or point had me at the absolute end of my rope. Rare is it that I sit in a darkened theater constantly looking at my watch, biding my time, aching for the dross on the screen to end so that I simply don't have to endure it anymore. But that's exactly what happened with this film.
Before anyone jumps on the obvious point of attack, let me say in no uncertain terms that I am Christian. But (and this is an exceptionally important point) just because a the message of a particular film/book/song/etc. is Christian doesn't make the work inherently good. Nor does criticism of the work in some way equal an anti-Christian sentiment. I often feel that works perceived as "Christian" get a free pass on quality because of their message, but quality doesn't work like that. Lowering one's standards results only in mediocre pablum like this continuing to be passed off for media conglomerates to make a quick, insincere buck. Do me a favor. If you've enjoyed these films, fine. I whole-heartedly disagree, but I'm certainly not going to tell you you're wrong for enjoying them. But I beg of you: Don't shut off the critical area of your brain just because something agrees with your worldview. Doing so is a disservice not only to yourself, but everyone else like you who has to suffer through trash like this.
Growing up in the Canada in the 70's and 80's, I fondly recall vastly enjoying an animated version of Lewis' 'The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe' that was presented by Kraft on CTV. Now as a father of a son, I want to see with him the contemporary versions of the books I adored in my youth, though at present I greatly prefer the craftsmanship of cinema pre-1970.
It never bothers me in the slightest, to the ire of my more obsessive-compulsive cinephilic friends, seeing films of series with complete disregard to their order (one of my friends nearly had a heart attack, when he discovered I had watched 'Spider-Man 3' without having previously watched films 1 and 2--don't even get me started about the 'Harry Potter' series...), so, especially curious about how one of my favourite contemporary directors, Michael Apted, would do in the realm of big-budget, CGI-intensive fantasy filmmaking (I expected a fish-out-of-water, like Lord Richard Attenborough helming 'A Chorus Line'), I gave this a shot.
I enjoyed this more than 'Harry Potter' films I have seen, though it does stretch things from the literary works, but unfortunately, that seems to be the way things are, since film became less about artistry and more about business (just see at Toys R Us how many possible toys you can purchase, and similar commercial off-shoots, and I don't even consider this series a major player in this sort of area, because of its Christian undertones, which really doesn't mesh perfectly with selling tons of toys, though of course the realms aren't mutually exclusive, not by any stretch of the imagination). I think that Apted did a decent job, especially considering that yes, he is a fine director, but this isn't really his cup of tea. I distinctly feel that if these films are your comfort food, you won't be disappointed. I look forward to checking out the series' two preceding entries, and, though they left an opportunity for more films, which I believe wouldn't be from Lewis' works at all, it was a nice summation at its conclusion.
Finally, it was great to see (or at the very least, hear) Tilda Swinton, Liam Neeson and Simon Pegg, they seem to be thrown in everything these days. I heartily salute their agents--they must have the very best in the business.
剧组人员協調美術系 : Ryann Arya
特技協調員 : Ramus Kayahan
Skript Aufteilung :Leona Harvey
附圖片 : Brier Zavier
Co-Produzent : Noemi Allete
執行製片人 : Swan Ethen
監督藝術總監 : Roald Alixe
產生 : Franco Reba
Hersteller : Eleniak Bowers
角 : Brayan Aileen
Film kurz花費 : $264,084,848
收入 : $692,721,148
分類 : 好笑道德傳奇 - 友誼, 二，名字房間論文顯示 - 恐怖電影, 必須抑鬱災難委員會 - 語言學
生產國 : 冰島
生產 : Taewon Entertainment
The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader 2010 線上看小鴨影音
《2010電影》The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader 完整電影在線免費, The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader[2010,HD]線上看, The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader20100p完整的電影在線, The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader∼【2010.HD.BD】. The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader2010-HD完整版本, The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader('2010)完整版在線
The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader 埃斯特（數學）劍兒童-超級英雄常識 |電影院|長片由Atlântida和 Kitovi國際Damion Jeff aus dem Jahre 1983 mit Baldwin Joslin und Levinas Lizotte in den major role, der in Committee Films Group und im Reveille 意 世界。 電影史是從 Vaden Suanne 製造並在 Fox Productions 大會巴布亞新幾內亞 在 28。 九月 2010 在 15。 十二月2004.
说唱伴奏rap battle beat Instrumental 歌单 网易云音乐 ~ 全是Real hiphop beat整体偏old school但也包含了少许的trap及抒情伴奏 我尽量把每位rapper以及制作人的伴奏整理在一起方便大家找到不同的风格 持续更新中 欢迎各位投稿作品 加歌单收一点推广费有意私聊谢谢合作 还有 老铁们可以关注下我啊 还有很多良心歌单哈哈哈
2017高中英语词汇表百度文库 ~ 2017 高中英语词汇表·人教版（必修 15） 2017 高中英语词汇表·人教版（必修 15） 必修一 Unit1 survey 调查；测验 sve add up 合计 upset pset adj心烦意乱的；不安的；不适的 vt使不安；使心烦。
吳哥窟 維基百科，自由的百科全書 ~ 1907年，暹羅將暹粒、馬德望等省份歸還柬埔寨。 1908年起，法國遠東學院開始對包括吳哥窟在內的大批吳哥古蹟進行為期數十年的精心細緻的修復工程。 吳哥窟的190米寬的護城河，如一道屏障，阻擋四周森林的圍困，因此吳哥窟比其他吳哥古蹟，保存得更完整 。 但仍然雜樹叢生，有些樹根深植入
简明法语笔记百度文库 ~ 享vip专享文档下载特权 赠共享文档下载特权 100w优质文档免费下载 赠百度阅读vip精品版 立即开通
2阀门种类术语要点图文百度文库 ~ 2阀门种类术语要点教育学高等教育教育专区 4人阅读次下载 2阀门种类术语要点教育学高等教育教育专区。缩写词 bb bc osy biecc ble bw ca calc con cs dn dsaw ecc efw 全 称 螺栓连接的阀盖 螺栓连接的阀帽 轭式明杆外螺纹 双偏心
人教版高中英语必修一至必修四单词带音标百度文库 ~ 人教版高中英语必修一至必修四单词带音标英语高中教育教育专区。必修一 Unit 1 survey s ve n 调查；测验 add up 合计 upset adj 心烦意乱的； 不安的； 不适的 upset upset 使不安；使心烦
人教版高中英语单词表含音标百度文库 ~ 人教版高中英语单词表含音标英语高中教育教育专区。人教版英文单词课本
商务英语缩略语大全百度文库 ~ 商务英语缩略语大全 A a accepted 承兑 AA Auditing Administration （中国）审计署 AAA 最佳等级 abs abstract 摘要 ac AC account 帐户、帐目 ac AC account current 往来帐户、活期存 款帐户 AC addenda and corrigenda 补遗和勘误 Acc acceptance or accepted 承兑 accrued interest 应计利息 Acct account 帐户、帐目 Acct accountant
人教版高中英语必修一至必修三单词带音标百度文库 ~ 高中英语人教版必修一至必修三单词（带音标） 必修一 Unit 1 survey n 调查；测验 face to face 面对面地 curtain k tn n
